if admins interefere and there is still imballance they will be accused for helping a side etc.There is no upside for them. Epics with 2 sides are boring anyway, thats why i said to split 3-3 if there was another even a weaker side last season on fire i am quite sure that the fence would have a harder time to win everything like they did.Even a weaker side flagging Zabor before they fight with irreale for example can make a difference.What is the alternative to what i am saying? have all big clans in one server and let Ukraine free farm?The clan that deserves the least to get the most?
i mean balance between the servers,similar amount of big clans and more or less similar amount of people in epics.Inside servers cant be balance,there will always be a dominant side at the end of the day.
There is a very big conversation about which clans will go to each of the servers.According to admins they will not interfere with this but that way
we will end up with two server that will have completely different dynamic.All big clans want to go to First server and face each others while
specific other "big war" clans want to take advantage of that and go free far mthe easy server to sell epics in the more competitive sides on the other server
Yes this happens we saw it last season even before merge.
I think the solution to that is a shuffle ,the same way it happens on football.At the moment we have 4 big sides(zabor/op/irreale/ph) and two a bit weaker (ukraine/kkk)All clan names in a "hat" and from there in front of all CLs there will be picked clans and which server they go to.2 big and 1 of the two weaker ones.
I dont know if this sounds stupid but will create a relative balance and it will be as fair as possible.Also there will not be a lag fest in one server with 2000 + at epics while on the other server it will be epics with 400-500 people in total.
